Feature #1131
open
Implement default reviewers for code review
Added by Anderson Santos about 9 years ago.
Updated over 7 years ago.
Estimated time:
(Total: 0.00 h)
Description
Currently it puts as a reviewer the owner of the repo. I don't know if there's an alternate way, but in case of RCE is Johannes, so every time we create a new PR, he will be selected even though most of the cases it will be some other member who will review it.
I propose we use this behavior only as a fallback and add an option to the repo to select the default reviewers. That way, we could even let the field blank and it will force the user to select a reviewer or something like that. The consequences still must be discussed.
- Private changed from No to Yes
- Target version changed from 76 to v4.3
- Private changed from Yes to No
This feature is about creating a special default reviewers implementation for repositories. It should replace the hacky rcextensiosn default reviewers module. Some specs:
- ability to define groups/users that are added as default reviewers to each PR of particular repo
- ability to mark that creator of PR cannot be the reviewer (common criteria requirement)
- ability to specify random pool of reviewers and pick N to review
- ability to propose reviewers based on annotation of code changes (similar to how https://github.com/facebook/mention-bot works)
- ideally it could be great to define "patterns" to reviewers. If i specify file pattern, then a change file matching the patterns would pick X users. There could be file, target-branch patterns at the beginnig.
- Subject changed from Remove default reviewer and add a per-repo default reviewers to Implement default reviewers for code review
- Target version changed from v4.3 to v4.4
I want you Dan to pick this up after current topics
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Target version changed from v4.4 to v4.5
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Updated by 
Updated by 
Updated by 
Updated by