Support #5503
openfailed to upgrade to 4.13.3
0%
Description
Upgrading from 4.11.6 to 4.13.3
rccontrol from 1.17.1 to 1.19.2
vcsserver-1 from 4.11.6 to 4.13.3 works
enterprise-1 from 4.11.6 to 4.13.3 fails.
Database updates ATTEMPTING TO UPGRADE DATABASE FROM VERSION 85 TO VERSION 90
upgrade step 86 to 89 run
followed by a sqla base reset
sqlalchemy.exc.ProgrammingError: (psycopg2.ProgrammingError) there is no unique constraint matching given keys for referenced table "repositories"
[SQL: '\nCREATE TABLE user_to_repo_branch_permissions (\n\tbranch_rule_id SERIAL NOT NULL, \n\trepository_id INTEGER NOT NULL, \n\tpermission_id INTEGER NOT NULL, \n\trule_to_perm_id INTEGER NOT NULL, \n\trule_order INTEGER NOT NULL, \n\tbranch_pattern TEXT, \n\tbranch_hash TEXT, \n\tPRIMARY KEY (branch_rule_id), \n\tFOREIGN KEY(repository_id) REFERENCES repositories (repo_id), \n\tFOREIGN KEY(permission_id) REFERENCES permissions (permission_id), \n\tFOREIGN KEY(rule_to_perm_id) REFERENCES repo_to_perm (repo_to_perm_id)\n)\n\n']
Upgrade of RhodeCode Enterprise failed.
Rolling back to previous version.
Attached is the output from the upgrade session
Files
Updated by Daniel D about 6 years ago
That is odd and unexpected. I'm assuming repositories table is in a bad state somehow.
Can you check on your postgres if repositories (repo_id) column is unique?
Was there any upgrade problems in older days related to database?
Best,
Updated by Daniel D about 6 years ago
Somehow this got into SPAM:
Postgres has unique repo_id for each row but they are not sequential:
rhodecode=> SELECT repo_id FROM repositories;
repo_id
---------
1
3
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
28
30
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
29
(30 rows)
##### mysql to postgres migration steps:
# yum install pgloader-3.4.1-3.rhel7.x86_64.rpm
# su - rhodecode
$ cat<<EOF>>migration_command
load database
from mysql://rhodecode:see-my.cnf-for-this-password@localhost:3306/rhodecode
into postgresql://rhodecode:see-pgpass-for-this-password@127.0.0.1/rhodecode
WITH truncate,
create no tables,
create no indexes,
reset no sequences
ALTER schema 'rhodecode' rename to 'public'
CAST type datetime to timestamp
;
EOF
$ ssh -L 3306:127.0.0.1:3306 username_mgr@mysqlhostname -N -f
$ scl enable rh-postgresql96 -- pgloader --dry-run migration_command
## make sure connection to both databases was successful
$ scl enable rh-postgresql96 -- pgloader migration_command
$ mv /tmp/pgloader/pgloader.log .
## make sure the data looks reasonable and the license_key made it
$ scl enable rh-postgresql96 -- psql rhodecode
rhodecode=> SELECT app_settings_value FROM rhodecode_settings WHERE app_settings_name = 'license_key';
## Fixup the database sequencing
$ scl enable rh-postgresql96 -- psql rhodecode
DO
$$
DECLARE
seqname text;
nspname text;
seqval bigint;
BEGIN
FOR nspname, seqname IN select n.nspname, c.relname FROM
pg_class c INNER JOIN pg_namespace n ON (c.relnamespace = n.oid)
WHERE c.relkind = 'S' AND n.nspname = 'public' LOOP
EXECUTE format('SELECT last_value FROM %I.%I', nspname, seqname) INTO seqval;
PERFORM setval(quote_ident(nspname)||'.'||quote_ident(seqname), seqval + 10000);
END LOOP;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
\q
Updated by Daniel D about 6 years ago
Can you check please if repo_id has an UNIQUE index set for Postgres? This is a requirement for this to continue, maybe the migration didn't convert that properly?
Updated by Stephen Serafin about 6 years ago
Is this what you are looking for:
rhodecode=> \d repositories_repo_id_seq
Sequence "public.repositories_repo_id_seq"
Column | Type | Value
---------------+---------+--------------------------
sequence_name | name | repositories_repo_id_seq
last_value | bigint | 10001
start_value | bigint | 1
increment_by | bigint | 1
max_value | bigint | 9223372036854775807
min_value | bigint | 1
cache_value | bigint | 1
log_cnt | bigint | 0
is_cycled | boolean | f
is_called | boolean | t
Owned by: public.repositories.repo_id
Updated by Daniel D about 6 years ago
Can you show output as in this example:
rhodecode=# select * from pg_indexes where tablename = 'repositories';
schemaname | tablename | indexname | tablespace | indexdef
------------+--------------+---------------------------------+------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
public | repositories | repositories_pkey | | CREATE UNIQUE INDEX repositories_pkey ON public.repositories USING btree (repo_id)
public | repositories | repositories_repo_name_hash_key | | CREATE UNIQUE INDEX repositories_repo_name_hash_key ON public.repositories USING btree (repo_name_hash)
public | repositories | r_repo_name_idx | | CREATE INDEX r_repo_name_idx ON public.repositories USING btree (repo_name)
(3 rows)
If you're missing any of those, please create as in indexdef example.
Updated by Stephen Serafin about 6 years ago
- File pg_indexes.gz pg_indexes.gz added
The migration includes a "create no indexes" as per the sqlite to postgres example on the wiki.
Are there any other indexes to consider?
Included is the output from
select * from pg_indexes;
Updated by Stephen Serafin about 6 years ago
- File rhodecode_migration.gz rhodecode_migration.gz added
Seeing some of the indexes on the source database it seems the migration plan needs modification.
Here is the goal:
From RHEL6 to RHEL7
From mysql 5.1.73 to postgres 9.6.10
From rabbitmq 3.1.5 to rabbitmq 3.7.8
From elasticsearch 2.3.0 to elasticsearch-oss 6.3.1
included are the steps for the rhodecode pieces
Updated by Daniel D about 6 years ago
Stephen -
The create no indexes
refers to the old database that is a source of data.
I believe that if you have a NEW database created it comes with all indexes and requirements meet. Then Pgloader just transfers the data.
Would you have any idea why the creation of initial database would lost indexes?
Updated by Daniel D about 6 years ago
I wonder if maybe we should try to do a PG -> PG migration to get the indexes back in place?